Trump Skeptical of Iran Proposal, Says Military Action Possible if Tehran ‘Misbehaves’
News Desk: In a high-stakes diplomatic moment, Donald Trump has expressed deep skepticism over a sweeping 14-point proposal submitted by Iran to end the ongoing conflict, saying he “can’t imagine” the terms being acceptable to the United States.
Speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One, Trump confirmed that the proposal—reportedly routed through Pakistan as a mediator—is under review by his national security team. “They’re going to give me the exact wording now… I’ll let you know about it later,” he said, while reiterating dissatisfaction with Tehran’s past offers.
The U.S. is unlikely to accept Iran’s latest proposal, U.S. President Donald Trump [@POTUS] said, adding he will review the plan but believes Tehran has not paid a “big enough price” yet. pic.twitter.com/WM07Afvemt
— TVP World (@TVPWorld_com) May 3, 2026
In a parallel post on Truth Social, Trump struck a sharper tone, arguing that Iran had “not yet paid a big enough price” for its actions over decades, signaling a hardline stance ahead of any negotiations.
TRUMP: Reviewing plan Iran just sent to us
‘CAN’T IMAGINE would be ACCEPTABLE’
Tehran’s ‘not yet paid BIG ENOUGH PRICE for what they’ve done to humanity’ https://t.co/UDMAMQDyPA pic.twitter.com/ZpOhf7zSxv
— RT (@RT_com) May 2, 2026
Iran Pushes Comprehensive Deal, Rejects Temporary Truce
According to Tasnim News Agency, Tehran’s proposal outlines a broad roadmap aimed at ending hostilities across multiple fronts—not just a limited ceasefire. This comes in contrast to an earlier US-backed nine-point framework that reportedly proposed a two-month pause in fighting.
Iran’s plan instead calls for a complete resolution within 30 days, alongside firm security guarantees against future military action. It also demands the withdrawal of US forces from surrounding regions and a full rollback of sanctions.
Economic provisions form a key part of the proposal, including:
- Release of frozen Iranian assets
- Lifting of naval and trade restrictions
- Compensation for damages caused by sanctions and military pressure
The proposal further extends beyond bilateral tensions, seeking to end what Tehran describes as a “war on all fronts,” including conflicts linked to Lebanon.
A notable feature is a proposed new governance mechanism for the Strait of Hormuz—a critical global energy corridor—aimed at ensuring uninterrupted oil transit.
Trump Warns of Renewed Military Action
Even as diplomatic channels remain open, Trump issued a stark warning from Florida, indicating that military strikes could resume if Iran “misbehaves.”
“If they do something bad… it’s certainly a possibility,” he said, without specifying triggers for such action.
Earlier, Trump had framed the situation bluntly: pursue diplomacy “on a human basis” or escalate decisively—underscoring the precarious balance between negotiation and confrontation.
Tehran Responds: ‘Prepared for Any Scenario’
Iranian officials have pushed back strongly. Senior commander Mohammad Jafar Asadi warned that Iran’s armed forces are fully prepared for any escalation, cautioning against what he termed “foolishness” by the US.
Meanwhile, Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the responsibility now lies with Washington. “The ball is in the United States’ court,” he stated, adding that Tehran is ready for both diplomacy and confrontation.
Ceasefire Holds, But Economic Shockwaves Persist
The diplomatic push comes against the backdrop of a fragile ceasefire that has been in place since April 8, following weeks of intense conflict involving the US, Israel, and Iran.
While active fighting has paused, the broader impact continues to ripple globally—particularly through disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. The vital oil route remains effectively constrained, keeping global energy prices nearly 50% higher than pre-conflict levels.
With Tehran awaiting Washington’s response, the coming days could prove decisive—either steering the region toward a comprehensive settlement or pushing it back to the brink of escalation.
